Ruling in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, on June 22, 1992, the majority opinion declared, “The ordinance is facially invalid under the First Amendment.”
The question presented was:
Whether “the ordinance was substantially overbroad and impermissibly content based” in violation of the First Amendment.
The opinion
Read the full rulingPDF · 1.92 MBPublished by the Library of Congress.
Oral argument
Listen at OyezOffsiteThe Court's own audio archive begins with the 2010 term, so this argument is held by Oyez rather than by supremecourt.gov.
